Achilles Tendon Tears: Is surgery needed?

Achilles tendon tears can be a debilitating injury, often raising the question of whether surgery is the best course of action. This article delves into the factors influencing this decision, focusing on the pivotal role of Ultrasound scans in determining the most effective treatment. In the past, surgical intervention was heavily influenced by the patient's activity level, particularly favouring athletes and the younger demographic. However, contemporary research has illuminated the efficacy of non-surgical treatments, challenging the conventional wisdom. This discussion aims to shed light on the evolving landscape of Achilles tendon tear management and the critical role that Ultrasound scans play in guiding treatment decisions.

The Evolution of Treatment Paradigms

In the not-too-distant past, the decision to opt for surgery or not was often guided by the patient's level of activity. Athletes and the younger population were commonly recommended for surgery, driven by the pursuit of enhanced recovery outcomes akin to the ethos of "harder, better, faster, stronger." However, recent advancements in non-surgical treatments have reshaped this paradigm, emphasising the importance of tailored rehabilitation programs.

Non-Surgical Advancements and Improved Outcomes

Modern studies have significantly altered the narrative surrounding Achilles tendon tears. Non-surgical treatments, when coupled with a specific rehabilitation program, have showcased outcomes on par with surgical interventions. This shift is noteworthy, especially considering the associated risks of surgery, with infection topping the list. The fear of infections leading to further complications, potential plastic surgery, and prolonged recovery times has prompted a reassessment of the once-conventional surgical approach.

Ultrasound Scans as Decision-Making Tools

Crucial to the contemporary approach in Achilles tendon tear management is the use of Ultrasound scans. These scans play a pivotal role in determining the appropriateness of non-surgical treatments by assessing the approximation of tendon ends during immobilisation. A key threshold is identified: a tendon gap larger than 10mm (5mm in specific cases) prompts a recommendation for surgery, while smaller gaps lean towards non-surgical options.

Weighing the Risks and Benefits

While non-surgical treatments showcase promising outcomes, it is essential to acknowledge the subtle differences in recovery time and re-rupture rates when compared to surgical interventions. The consultation process becomes paramount, as healthcare professionals and patients must collaboratively weigh these nuances against the potential risks associated with surgery. Striking the right balance between recovery outcomes and surgical risks becomes integral to informed decision-making.

Recognising the signs and symptoms of these conditions is crucial for seeking timely medical attention. Mr Francesc Malagelada is dedicated to diagnosing and treating various foot and ankle conditions, providing personalised treatment plans to address your specific needs and help you get back on your feet comfortably. Contact us and book an appointment today!

Keep in mind that our blog is also a great place if you’d like to stay updated on the latest orthopaedic news.

This article is for information purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Consult your physician for personalised guidance. In case of a medical emergency, contact your doctor or emergency services.